SPACE TRAVEL
- Tau
- Admin
- Posts:750
- Joined:Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:58 am
- Affiliation:Futureville Mafia
- IGN:TehPwnzor7306
- Location:Ancapistan
Alrighty then.
Manned private spaceflight will be viable and affordable to the common man by 2030. By the year 2040 we should have our first commercially viable fusion reactor, and by 2055 we will have made our first manned round-trip to and from Mars. By 2060 we will have our first permanent lunar base. By 2100, laws and regulations relating to the consumption of alcohol and other controlled substances in space will be relaxed, allowing for someone to be high as fuck while already high as fuck.
Manned private spaceflight will be viable and affordable to the common man by 2030. By the year 2040 we should have our first commercially viable fusion reactor, and by 2055 we will have made our first manned round-trip to and from Mars. By 2060 we will have our first permanent lunar base. By 2100, laws and regulations relating to the consumption of alcohol and other controlled substances in space will be relaxed, allowing for someone to be high as fuck while already high as fuck.

Vinyl wrote:"RP" and gaming and homosexuality is what's keeping [the forum] afloat.
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:728
- Joined:Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:31 pm
- Affiliation:White
- IGN:Nevank
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
I think it will take about another 50 years to have routine trips to Mars. What needs to happen first is a Mars Colony, such as Mars One which goes up in 10 years or so.
Throw the commies in the drink so my country can be free!
- Tau
- Admin
- Posts:750
- Joined:Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:58 am
- Affiliation:Futureville Mafia
- IGN:TehPwnzor7306
- Location:Ancapistan
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
In my opinion, if we send out a colony somewhere, we need to have the capacity to either bring the crew back or make the colony permanent and self-populating.

Vinyl wrote:"RP" and gaming and homosexuality is what's keeping [the forum] afloat.
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:728
- Joined:Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:31 pm
- Affiliation:White
- IGN:Nevank
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
Well Mars One is permanent. The people going are never coming back. Unless technology catches up with them that is. It basically means that the mission is pretty pointless. However. The moon landing was pointless wasn't it? But it was the expensive step that we needed to take in order to assure future trips to the moon. So the Mars One mission and others like it are pretty important even though they probably wont increase our knowledge about the planet at all.
Throw the commies in the drink so my country can be free!
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
Mars 1 isn't permanent, it's supposed to be three years, something like that. The structures themselves are permanent, but the crew will be replaced every cycle. I say that 2023 is too optimistic, though. Maybe in the 30s there'll be a permanent settlement, with tests in the 20s. The idea of cheap manned space in the next 50 years might bear fruit, now that some private companies are getting involved.
E: Wait, why is anyone even trying to get to Mars when we don't even have any structures on Luna? That's just stupid, like trying to buy an army in an RTS without fist buying a bank.
EE: I mean we could easily do that within the next ten years. Then we would have a place to launch rockets that need only a fraction of the thrust to reach escape velocity, no atmosphere, somewhere easily sustainable, and it took two weeks to get there in the 60s.
EEE: Oh, and we wouldn't have to wait two and a half years for the moon to come back around.
E: Wait, why is anyone even trying to get to Mars when we don't even have any structures on Luna? That's just stupid, like trying to buy an army in an RTS without fist buying a bank.
EE: I mean we could easily do that within the next ten years. Then we would have a place to launch rockets that need only a fraction of the thrust to reach escape velocity, no atmosphere, somewhere easily sustainable, and it took two weeks to get there in the 60s.
EEE: Oh, and we wouldn't have to wait two and a half years for the moon to come back around.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
- fr0stbyte124
- Developer
- Posts:727
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:39 am
- Affiliation:Aye-Aye
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
There's no realistic reason to ever colonize Mars. Ever. It's worse than Earth in every conceivable category. Even if an asteroid hit the Earth and wiped out all life, Earth still wouldn't be as crappy as Mars.
The moon? Sure. Plentiful sunlight and the prospect of Helium 3, low gravity R&D and powerful observatories. Plus it is a practical distance to be useful to Earth. F**k Mars.
The moon? Sure. Plentiful sunlight and the prospect of Helium 3, low gravity R&D and powerful observatories. Plus it is a practical distance to be useful to Earth. F**k Mars.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1940
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:18 pm
- Affiliation:ZIF
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
But mars is the perfect war planet! It even has it in the name!fr0stbyte124 wrote:There's no realistic reason to ever colonize Mars. Ever. It's worse than Earth in every conceivable category. Even if an asteroid hit the Earth and wiped out all life, Earth still wouldn't be as crappy as Mars.
The moon? Sure. Plentiful sunlight and the prospect of Helium 3, low gravity R&D and powerful observatories. Plus it is a practical distance to be useful to Earth. F**k Mars.
BASH THE FASH CLASS WAR NOW
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
Well see Mars contains valuable metals as far as I know ... Plus human curiosity - to colonize couse we can !
Last but not least I think if an asteroid hits earth (I mean of significant size) there wont be much left so yea Mars suddenly becomes an attractive alternative.
Last but not least I think if an asteroid hits earth (I mean of significant size) there wont be much left so yea Mars suddenly becomes an attractive alternative.
They're watching ... 
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
-
- Recruit
- Posts:0
- Joined:Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:09 am
- Affiliation:no
- IGN:cesara
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
I guess it's time to add my opinion of where space travel is going.
My predictions:
My more hopeful predictions:
Will add more as seen fit.
My predictions:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
- fr0stbyte124
- Developer
- Posts:727
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:39 am
- Affiliation:Aye-Aye
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
It would take a pretty big asteroid to make Earth less hospitable than a planet with 0.6% the atmosphere of Earth and incapable of holding onto liquid water or protecting the surface from solar radiation (because no magnetic field.)Iv121 wrote:Last but not least I think if an asteroid hits earth (I mean of significant size) there wont be much left so yea Mars suddenly becomes an attractive alternative.
Even if life got so bad on Earth that everyone had to live inside bubbled cities, guess which planet is the one we can actually get the material to make it? Seriously, I just looked up lists of reasons to colonize Mars. The best ones were along the lines of "Of all the s**thole places to live in our solar system, this one is the closest to almost not being completely inhospitable to any sort of life, past or future, second only to literally anywhere on Earth except for maybe an active volcano." It's like people just want to colonize Mars anyway and are hunting for reasons to justify it.
@Solar
I think your dates are too conservative. 2060 is projected by some to be when we hit a technology singularity. After that, all bets are off. I wouldn't be surprised if we could reshape the laws of physics within the next century or two.
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
Well if you go like that there are no planets worth of colonizing for the next few lightyears from earth, Mars is the easiest one to fix as it is actually possible to create an oxygen rich atmosphere there.
They're watching ... 
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:781
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:00 pm
- Affiliation:Darkstar Security CO
- Location:Brazil.
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
Mars One is permanent
They will be sending 4 people till the colony has a acceptable population.
And to create a warpdrive,we are very near of it.
We just need a better sensor [Or a new Einsten] to make everything possible.
They will be sending 4 people till the colony has a acceptable population.
And to create a warpdrive,we are very near of it.
We just need a better sensor [Or a new Einsten] to make everything possible.
" We explore... and you call us criminals. We seek after knowledge, and you call us criminals.We exist without skin color, without nationality, without religous bias... and you call us criminals.You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie to us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're the
criminals.Yes, I am a crimial. My crime is that of curiosity."
EMPRAH * BRUVA
criminals.Yes, I am a crimial. My crime is that of curiosity."
EMPRAH * BRUVA
- Tau
- Admin
- Posts:750
- Joined:Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:58 am
- Affiliation:Futureville Mafia
- IGN:TehPwnzor7306
- Location:Ancapistan
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
fr0stbyte124 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if we could reshape the laws of physics within the next century or two.
Spoiler:

Vinyl wrote:"RP" and gaming and homosexuality is what's keeping [the forum] afloat.
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:728
- Joined:Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:31 pm
- Affiliation:White
- IGN:Nevank
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
Last I checked, it stated quite clearly on the website that those who go on Mars One will stay on Mars for the rest of their lives. We aren't capable of sending something to Mars with enough fuel to return. They may add on to the base every few years but they're not coming back unless technology catches up with them.catsonmeth wrote:Mars 1 isn't permanent, it's supposed to be three years, something like that. The structures themselves are permanent, but the crew will be replaced every cycle. I say that 2023 is too optimistic, though. Maybe in the 30s there'll be a permanent settlement, with tests in the 20s. The idea of cheap manned space in the next 50 years might bear fruit, now that some private companies are getting involved.
E: Wait, why is anyone even trying to get to Mars when we don't even have any structures on Luna? That's just stupid, like trying to buy an army in an RTS without fist buying a bank.
EE: I mean we could easily do that within the next ten years. Then we would have a place to launch rockets that need only a fraction of the thrust to reach escape velocity, no atmosphere, somewhere easily sustainable, and it took two weeks to get there in the 60s.
EEE: Oh, and we wouldn't have to wait two and a half years for the moon to come back around.
Throw the commies in the drink so my country can be free!
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:728
- Joined:Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:31 pm
- Affiliation:White
- IGN:Nevank
Re: SPACE TRAVEL
reply to Solars predictions:
We are already super close to solving the problem of warp, or FTL drive, and terraforming is a pretty simple technology. I would be surprised if we weren't doing it within the next 150 years...
We are already super close to solving the problem of warp, or FTL drive, and terraforming is a pretty simple technology. I would be surprised if we weren't doing it within the next 150 years...
Throw the commies in the drink so my country can be free!