Fussion anyone?

[Saravanth]

Step one: Remove China, North Korea, Russia and the greedy US corporations.
Step one.five: Get independent from Oil so the arabs get mostly irrelevant too.
Step two: Look as the rest of the world now can work out our errors and stuff.

ftfy

[Archduke Daynel, PhD]

But gradual independence, otherwise Norway will become poor third world country, like Sweden :'(
Probably not though, the oil money we already got could on its own keep the country running for 4 years.

[Shadowcatbot]

Step one: Remove China, North Korea, Russia and the greedy US corporations.
Step one.five: Get independent from Oil so the arabs get mostly irrelevant too.
Step two: Look as the rest of the world now can work out our errors and stuff.

ftfy

Step three: counquer the Americas and then, the moon/space.

[Error]

Conquer space with fusion and then begin the slow, inexorable interstellar grind, where humanity becomes an unstoppable juggernaut slowly expanding into the galaxy nomming everything in its path.

[Archduke Daynel, PhD]

I guess it's inevitable; if we don't kill ourselves first, we will conquer the universe. We are the perfect conquest machines; stubborn, inventive, too curious for our own good and we procreate for fun.

[Saravanth]

If we procreated through spores we'd almost be white orks.

[CommanderKobialka]

Step one: Remove China, North Korea, and the greedy US corporations.
Step two: Look as the rest of the world now can work out our errors and stuff.

You should take out Iraq, Iran, Syria, and all the stans while your at it.

[Archduke Daynel, PhD]

Right, right.
China, NK, US corporations, and the middle east. Nukes where possible, assassination where not. Who's with me?

[Ivan2006]

You can negotiate their surrender at my place.

[ACH0225]

Right, right.
China, NK, US corporations, and the middle east. Nukes where possible, assassination where not. Who's with me?

Stop being such communist. Embrace the oligarchy.

[Archduke Daynel, PhD]

I'm as much against communism as any other fellow, but full-on capitalism isn't much better.
And that whole lobbying thing, and only two parties, no wonder the US is such a mess.

[ACH0225]

I'm as much against communism as any other fellow, but full-on capitalism isn't much better.
And that whole lobbying thing, and only two parties, no wonder the US is such a mess.

Full on capitalism=greatest period of human economic development(c. 1800 onwards)

[Archduke Daynel, PhD]

Yeah but it sucks for the poor, which is why we don't have it any more.
But once we got robots to make stuff, maybe we can have good and safe capitalism. Or something. I can't politics.

[ACH0225]

Yeah but it sucks for the poor, which is why we don't have it any more.
But once we got robots to make stuff, maybe we can have good and safe capitalism. Or something. I can't politics.

1: Sucks to be poor then
2: In the glorious People's Republic they do
3: Low wage people are only marginally worse than robots.
4: Safe capitalism is bad capitalism

[Error]

1. Form FC Council
2. Assassinate and/or nuke opponenets where possible
3. Take over the world a d become a mostly-benevolent oligarchy
4. Find the right capitalism/communism/socialism/whateverthefuckism balance
5. ???
6. Profit!


As long as the owl isn't allowed outside the Inquisition buildings, I'm in.