Aviation Thread
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Iv, not all AA needs radar; in fact, probably more than half are SACLOS(Semi-Autonomous Command Line Of Sight), Infrared, MCLOS(Manual Command Line of Sight), or auto cannon flak. While none of these can shoot down artillery shells, some of these can shoot down low-flying subsonic missiles.

mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:728
- Joined:Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:31 pm
- Affiliation:White
- IGN:Nevank
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:781
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:00 pm
- Affiliation:Darkstar Security CO
- Location:Brazil.
Re: Aviation Thread
is of poorIv121 wrote:Well what it lacks is a good radar similar to the one on the the Iron Dome but it does deal with cruising missiles alright, its not effective as a weapon though.
is of bad
" We explore... and you call us criminals. We seek after knowledge, and you call us criminals.We exist without skin color, without nationality, without religous bias... and you call us criminals.You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie to us and try to make us believe it's for our own good, yet we're the
criminals.Yes, I am a crimial. My crime is that of curiosity."
EMPRAH * BRUVA
criminals.Yes, I am a crimial. My crime is that of curiosity."
EMPRAH * BRUVA
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3217
- Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:54 pm
- Affiliation:Hexalan
- IGN:PCaptainRexK
- Location:Hexalan
Re: Aviation Thread
Crash Override wrote:Iv121 wrote:Well what it lacks is a good radar similar to the one on the the Iron Dome but it does deal with cruising missiles alright, its not effective as a weapon though.Spoiler:
cats wrote:I literally cannot be wrong about this fictional universe
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3021
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
- Affiliation:[redacted]
- IGN:Ivan2006
- Location:In a universe.
- Contact:
Re: Aviation Thread
FTFYCommanderKobialka wrote:B17s were cool
I'd say a good air defense should be made of an assortment of various systems that cover each other's weaknesses.ACH0225 wrote:Iv, not all AA needs radar; in fact, probably more than half are SACLOS(Semi-Autonomous Command Line Of Sight), Infrared, MCLOS(Manual Command Line of Sight), or auto cannon flak. While none of these can shoot down artillery shells, some of these can shoot down low-flying subsonic missiles.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: Aviation Thread
Congratulations, you figured out the concept of a multilayer air defence screen.

mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
-
- Lt. Commander
- Posts:728
- Joined:Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:31 pm
- Affiliation:White
- IGN:Nevank
Re: Aviation Thread
Modern bombers aren't as fun. It's all about stealth these days. They don't have loads of machine gun turrets sticking out of all sides. :lCommanderKobialka wrote:B17s are still cool
Then:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Throw the commies in the drink so my country can be free!
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3021
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
- Affiliation:[redacted]
- IGN:Ivan2006
- Location:In a universe.
- Contact:
Re: Aviation Thread
they started limiting the turrets to tail turrets when switching to jet-powered bombers for a reason: it's unaerodynamic.
Not to mention that with missiles becoming more and more advanced, machine guns no longer were a viable defense against fighters.
they may look cool, but in reality those machine guns won't do a thing. Gun dakka is only effective against ground targets nowadays unfortunately, or as a backup plan for fighters if for some reason missiles don't work. And I highly doubt this will have any chance of changing unless they can get lasers on fighters and bombers that allow them to intercept missiles heading for them or if energy shields become a thing.
Not to mention that with missiles becoming more and more advanced, machine guns no longer were a viable defense against fighters.
they may look cool, but in reality those machine guns won't do a thing. Gun dakka is only effective against ground targets nowadays unfortunately, or as a backup plan for fighters if for some reason missiles don't work. And I highly doubt this will have any chance of changing unless they can get lasers on fighters and bombers that allow them to intercept missiles heading for them or if energy shields become a thing.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
-
- Moderator
- Posts:4205
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:49 am
- Affiliation:CNI
- IGN:FC_Rangefinder
- Location:Sol IIIa, School of Hard Knocks
Re: Aviation Thread
Odds are, it'll become a race of AA vs. ECM. Or moar stealth.
'Cause More Dakka only applies wheny our enemy isn't being a * and using self-guided weapons, OR you have a few thousand bombers available.
'Cause More Dakka only applies wheny our enemy isn't being a * and using self-guided weapons, OR you have a few thousand bombers available.

-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: Aviation Thread
The thing about ECM is that there are missiles it simply doesn't affect, like wire-riding SACLOS missiles, which have a tiny wire from the launcher to the missile and are impossible to hack. Or bullet; I have yet to meet man who can outsmart bullet.

mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler: