We're getting this motherducker to use techne.

Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
I don't rush much I will only upload completed ships... Unless I'm showing off a new dreadnought design, something like that.Ivan2006 wrote:You mentioned regulary release scedules.
Please don't, rushed stuff usually turns out horrible.
Also, I agree with the other members, stuff usually looks best above a certain size.
Fighters are almost impossible to make look good, shuttles are hard.
Corvettes are good for starters, maybe a frigate.
Oh, and also if you got here by some way from the MC-forums post, that one is horribly outdated and no longer accurately reflects our plans.
It never was meant as more than a first concept and at this point is completely pointless. The person who made it has also left, so we can't make changes to it anymore either.
Okay... For one, I have no patience to build a fighter like a dreadnought... It'll be bad enough building a dreadnought. Secondly, looking at Techne, it also seems very complicated, if not to use then to learn to use. So I may just pass on using either.prototype wrote:For fighters, use micro blocks or something. Or if you feel adventurous give Techne a go.
No, not really. Just add fanciness.prototype wrote:Back to topic, I think bibliocraft allows you to cut blocks up into smaller blocks.
pfft, I can pull it off.Ivan2006 wrote:Fighters are almost impossible to make look good
Commander Error wrote:"Titan" - Moves slightly quicker than a glacier, on a good day.
Prototype wrote:F-14s are just gay Tornados.
Catsonmeth wrote:Which meant every two weeks, Tuesday night was reserved for mainlining coffee and getting sensual with a keyboard
I completely agree with this.Iv121 wrote:If you don’t try you don’t improve, just be able to take a step back and evaluate your work, or take criticism.
blockman42 wrote:Every Friday? I like to take a week to think of ideas and then binge build for 2 days.
cats wrote:I literally cannot be wrong about this fictional universe