FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Forum rules
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
Like this
The spikes on the side don't really need to have a membrane.
Spoiler:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
I made an emblem for the Peregrine. It's kind of large and detailed, but if you can do the HD trick with a smaller version it might work.


"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
I have no idea where I'm going to fit that, possibly on the top of the cockpit but I wanted something else there... I'll see if I can free up a space.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
You could use the Strigiforme Symbol, shown somewhere. It's in the KSP pass the save thread in the post I signed up in, I think. Wherever that is.

mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
Well the mechs aren't officially tied to factions at the moment.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
You know what would be neat if you put written books for each of the vehicles and weapons in the pack like manuals or histories.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
I can't quite do that in Flan's mod, unfortunately, I can write up the descriptions and stick them on all the download pages though.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
You could slip it into a resource pack download or something... I think you could do that, I haven't messed with MC since 1.6 first came out. I'm trying to come up with some ideas for Peregrine-specific weapons since so far all I have are two moderately okay ones, the gauss rifle and an ion cannon thing.
Spoiler:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
Okay I have more mech weapons.
Spoiler:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
And I made a few edits to the symbol so it looks less like an angry chicken.


"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
Pretty much finished the main body:






Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
It needs the sloped shoulder/side torso. This throws off the agile, predatory look and the legs won't fit at all, not to mention the arms will be completely misplaced so it will be unbalanced when it does or doesn't have weapons. More like the Fafnir 2 than the Peregrine. Its an easy fix though, you just have to put two large blocks to elongate, flush with the shoulders. The bottom half is also too cylindrical, it should be angled more like the prow of a boat than a column.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
What I can possibly do is cut the exhaust port in half height wise, and draw the bottom of it up to it, but that requires completely remodelling the sides to make it all line up, which is going to take me another day or so, and isn't going to make much difference, the slope would be very shallow, and without excessively extending the whole thing backwards I can't work out a way to do this. I'm banking on the sloped back arms countering for it.
EDIT: trying something, not going to make any promises though.
EDIT2: getting somewhere, but could end up with an unsightly flat spot at the bottom of the back.
EDIT3: ok, how far back exactly does it need to be drawn back? I am not going to do a third remodel, and by the bottom half, is it the back that's the issue? cause the front is already angled, making that more angled will mean pretty much cocking up proportions.
EDIT: trying something, not going to make any promises though.
EDIT2: getting somewhere, but could end up with an unsightly flat spot at the bottom of the back.
EDIT3: ok, how far back exactly does it need to be drawn back? I am not going to do a third remodel, and by the bottom half, is it the back that's the issue? cause the front is already angled, making that more angled will mean pretty much cocking up proportions.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
The slope in the arms will look out of place without the angular body. I really should have redesigned the torso like I said I would, I'm starting to have some pretty neat ideas.
The cockpit is a bit too small and much too high, if you lowered it and maybe added some to the bottom it might help a little, but the largest probem is still the shoulders, they need to be farther back than where the back ends, so the slope has to be pretty deep. Something that would help tremendously is getting rid of the verticallines where I he panels intersect on the side. I dont know if you can but the whole oittom halfjust needs to be flattened a little. I'll draw some corrections now and try to keep them relatively simple.
The cockpit is a bit too small and much too high, if you lowered it and maybe added some to the bottom it might help a little, but the largest probem is still the shoulders, they need to be farther back than where the back ends, so the slope has to be pretty deep. Something that would help tremendously is getting rid of the verticallines where I he panels intersect on the side. I dont know if you can but the whole oittom halfjust needs to be flattened a little. I'll draw some corrections now and try to keep them relatively simple.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [SUPERTHREADNAUGHT]
re-jigged the body:


Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler: