FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Forum rules
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Will the guns be in 3-D!? Also SR armour could do with looking at least a little less like robocop...

mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Yes they will be, hopefully to a similar level of detail as these:ACH0225 wrote:Will the guns be in 3-D!? Also SR armour could do with looking at least a little less like robocop...
Spoiler:
Also this is what I've done so far on the NSCD armour, little glitchy as I haven't matched it up properly yet
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
What is the refined list of weapons you want to include?
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
- Tau
- Admin
- Posts:750
- Joined:Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:58 am
- Affiliation:Futureville Mafia
- IGN:TehPwnzor7306
- Location:Ancapistan
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Fucking shit. Those guns are Blockland-level detailed.

Vinyl wrote:"RP" and gaming and homosexuality is what's keeping [the forum] afloat.
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Though the texture work is a bit lacking, especially that emblem that looks out of place like hell ...
They're watching ... 
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
At the moment just the HB-7, AB-24 and LRW-21, I'll do the rail weapons too at some point but they already have a good design based on Toaster's original HD icons.catsonmeth wrote:What is the refined list of weapons you want to include?
As for detail, I'm going to use the modelscale to make it more detailed, this is the AB24 at the moment:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
About the rail weapons, a rail MG doesn't make much sense. I think it would be better to have only a marksman rifle and maybe another long-range weapon. Maybe an anti-materiel accelerator. This would mostly be so we wouldn't have so many Rail [Gun type]s. Are you scrapping all of the other [Faction Name]-[Weapon Type]s and starting from scratch?
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Not scrapping the factions, it's just the old guns need a big rework so might as well do it properly.catsonmeth wrote:About the rail weapons, a rail MG doesn't make much sense. I think it would be better to have only a marksman rifle and maybe another long-range weapon. Maybe an anti-materiel accelerator. This would mostly be so we wouldn't have so many Rail [Gun type]s. Are you scrapping all of the other [Faction Name]-[Weapon Type]s and starting from scratch?
The MG is just the rifle with a bigger ammo capacity, less accurate and more for heavy suppresive fire.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Ok, managed to get attachments to work properly:


And I thought rather than clip loading, you load an energy cell into the side of the gun


And I thought rather than clip loading, you load an energy cell into the side of the gun
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
-
- Moderator
- Posts:4205
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:49 am
- Affiliation:CNI
- IGN:FC_Rangefinder
- Location:Sol IIIa, School of Hard Knocks
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
So rail weapons are serving as marksman's rifles, and lazors are moving more towards assault rifle type thing?
Assuming MGs will be used as support weapons.
(Nice model, by the way. Attachments are awesome.)
Assuming MGs will be used as support weapons.
(Nice model, by the way. Attachments are awesome.)

-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Actually I could make the Rail MG deployable.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Please no. The incredibru power is needed.

mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
I feel like we should hold a conference.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
It's pretty OP at the moment.ACH0225 wrote:Please no. The incredibru power is needed.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Replace the rail MG with a plasmathrower.
E: I had a design for it but photoshop crashed
EE: Wow our emoti things are stupid. That is way more sad than I meant for it to be.
E: I had a design for it but photoshop crashed

EE: Wow our emoti things are stupid. That is way more sad than I meant for it to be.

Last edited by cats on Sun Mar 09, 2014 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler: