FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]

Organized and clear discussion only. Be sure to read sub-forum descriptions.
Forum rules
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
ACH0225
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts:2312
Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
Affiliation:Strigiforme
IGN:ACH0225
Location:Cuuyth
Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by ACH0225 » Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:11 am

Will the guns be in 3-D!? Also SR armour could do with looking at least a little less like robocop...
Image
fr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
mfw brony images
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image
Image

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Prototype » Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:32 am

ACH0225 wrote:Will the guns be in 3-D!? Also SR armour could do with looking at least a little less like robocop...
Yes they will be, hopefully to a similar level of detail as these:
Spoiler:
Image

Image
And yes I'll make the SR armour less like robocop. But that mean's I'll have to scrap the visor.
Also this is what I've done so far on the NSCD armour, little glitchy as I haven't matched it up properly yet
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Manus's new addons for the Sci-fi pack...
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by cats » Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:39 am

What is the refined list of weapons you want to include?
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

User avatar
Tau
Admin
Posts:750
Joined:Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:58 am
Affiliation:Futureville Mafia
IGN:TehPwnzor7306
Location:Ancapistan

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Tau » Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:54 am

Fucking shit. Those guns are Blockland-level detailed.
Image
Vinyl wrote:"RP" and gaming and homosexuality is what's keeping [the forum] afloat.

User avatar
Iv121
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts:2414
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:40 pm
Affiliation:UTN
Location:-> HERE <-

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Iv121 » Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:32 pm

Though the texture work is a bit lacking, especially that emblem that looks out of place like hell ...
They're watching ... Image

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Prototype » Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:34 pm

catsonmeth wrote:What is the refined list of weapons you want to include?
At the moment just the HB-7, AB-24 and LRW-21, I'll do the rail weapons too at some point but they already have a good design based on Toaster's original HD icons.

As for detail, I'm going to use the modelscale to make it more detailed, this is the AB24 at the moment:
Spoiler:
Image
Grip, stock, scope and grip can be interchanged with attachments.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by cats » Sun Mar 09, 2014 1:16 pm

About the rail weapons, a rail MG doesn't make much sense. I think it would be better to have only a marksman rifle and maybe another long-range weapon. Maybe an anti-materiel accelerator. This would mostly be so we wouldn't have so many Rail [Gun type]s. Are you scrapping all of the other [Faction Name]-[Weapon Type]s and starting from scratch?
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Prototype » Sun Mar 09, 2014 1:20 pm

catsonmeth wrote:About the rail weapons, a rail MG doesn't make much sense. I think it would be better to have only a marksman rifle and maybe another long-range weapon. Maybe an anti-materiel accelerator. This would mostly be so we wouldn't have so many Rail [Gun type]s. Are you scrapping all of the other [Faction Name]-[Weapon Type]s and starting from scratch?
Not scrapping the factions, it's just the old guns need a big rework so might as well do it properly.

The MG is just the rifle with a bigger ammo capacity, less accurate and more for heavy suppresive fire.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Prototype » Sun Mar 09, 2014 1:26 pm

Ok, managed to get attachments to work properly:
Image

Image

And I thought rather than clip loading, you load an energy cell into the side of the gun
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

Error
Moderator
Posts:4205
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:49 am
Affiliation:CNI
IGN:FC_Rangefinder
Location:Sol IIIa, School of Hard Knocks

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Error » Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:12 pm

So rail weapons are serving as marksman's rifles, and lazors are moving more towards assault rifle type thing?

Assuming MGs will be used as support weapons.

(Nice model, by the way. Attachments are awesome.)
Image

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Prototype » Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:23 pm

Actually I could make the Rail MG deployable.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

ACH0225
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts:2312
Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
Affiliation:Strigiforme
IGN:ACH0225
Location:Cuuyth

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by ACH0225 » Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:25 pm

Please no. The incredibru power is needed.
Image
fr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
mfw brony images
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image
Image

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by cats » Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:41 pm

I feel like we should hold a conference.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by Prototype » Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:44 pm

ACH0225 wrote:Please no. The incredibru power is needed.
It's pretty OP at the moment.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]

Post by cats » Sun Mar 09, 2014 4:29 pm

Replace the rail MG with a plasmathrower.

E: I had a design for it but photoshop crashed :(

EE: Wow our emoti things are stupid. That is way more sad than I meant for it to be. :[
Last edited by cats on Sun Mar 09, 2014 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

Post Reply