Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types

Post yer RPs here.

?

 
Total votes: 0

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm
Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types

Post by cats » Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:08 pm

Alduin wrote:
catsonmeth wrote:
Alduin wrote: like i said, just an example....
...Of a point-based system.
....Nooo? A suggestion of one of many systems to make a standard comparison system for weapon damage types
Then make another example.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

User avatar
Alduin
Cadet
Cadet
Posts:25
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:37 pm
Affiliation:Dovan Empire
Location:Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake

Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types

Post by Alduin » Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:34 pm

catsonmeth wrote: Then make another example.
Really? you expect me to do everything here? How about YOU make an example?
Image
Nickname:Emperor_Revan(and roleplay)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image
Spoiler:
Image

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types

Post by Prototype » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:49 pm

Alduin wrote:
catsonmeth wrote: Then make another example.
Really? you expect me to do everything here? How about YOU make an example?
Geez, no need to get so angry about it.

Ok, here's my attempt:

We just use reason as to how much damages stuff inflicts, if someone can make up stats about their weapon, they should be able to do this.

It isn't foolproof, but I don't believe foolproof exists, for all you need is a bigger idiot
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
Alduin
Cadet
Cadet
Posts:25
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:37 pm
Affiliation:Dovan Empire
Location:Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake

Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types

Post by Alduin » Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:56 pm

Prototype wrote:
Alduin wrote:
catsonmeth wrote: Then make another example.
Really? you expect me to do everything here? How about YOU make an example?
Geez, no need to get so angry about it.

Ok, here's my attempt:

We just use reason as to how much damages stuff inflicts, if someone can make up stats about their weapon, they should be able to do this.

It isn't foolproof, but I don't believe foolproof exists, for all you need is a bigger idiot
sure, but that doesnt do anything for a standard weapon damage measurement system
Image
Nickname:Emperor_Revan(and roleplay)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image
Spoiler:
Image

Ivan2006
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts:3021
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
Affiliation:[redacted]
IGN:Ivan2006
Location:In a universe.
Contact:

Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types

Post by Ivan2006 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:07 am

Do you have any Idea how long a faction description would become if one was to give such detailed stats about anything?
Longer than my EE thread, and if you löook at it, you´ll notice the lenght of its OP.
not everyone will have the patience to write that much, especially not at once.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
CMA wrote:IT'S MY HOT BODY AND I DO WHAT I WANT WITH IT.
Tiel wrote:hey now no need to be rough
Daynel wrote: you can talk gay and furry to me any time
CMA wrote:And I can't fuck myself, my ass is currently occupied

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types

Post by Prototype » Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:22 pm

Ivan2006 wrote:Do you have any Idea how long a faction description would become if one was to give such detailed stats about anything?
Longer than my EE thread, and if you löook at it, you´ll notice the lenght of its OP.
not everyone will have the patience to write that much, especially not at once.
Hence we use logic, anyone who can't follow logic would be unable to follow a standard system anyway.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

Post Reply