Then make another example.Alduin wrote:....Nooo? A suggestion of one of many systems to make a standard comparison system for weapon damage typescatsonmeth wrote:...Of a point-based system.Alduin wrote: like i said, just an example....
Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
- Alduin
- Cadet
- Posts:25
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:37 pm
- Affiliation:Dovan Empire
- Location:Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake
Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types
Really? you expect me to do everything here? How about YOU make an example?catsonmeth wrote: Then make another example.
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types
Geez, no need to get so angry about it.Alduin wrote:Really? you expect me to do everything here? How about YOU make an example?catsonmeth wrote: Then make another example.
Ok, here's my attempt:
We just use reason as to how much damages stuff inflicts, if someone can make up stats about their weapon, they should be able to do this.
It isn't foolproof, but I don't believe foolproof exists, for all you need is a bigger idiot
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler:
- Alduin
- Cadet
- Posts:25
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:37 pm
- Affiliation:Dovan Empire
- Location:Dov-Class Super Star Destroyer Glories Wake
Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types
sure, but that doesnt do anything for a standard weapon damage measurement systemPrototype wrote:Geez, no need to get so angry about it.Alduin wrote:Really? you expect me to do everything here? How about YOU make an example?catsonmeth wrote: Then make another example.
Ok, here's my attempt:
We just use reason as to how much damages stuff inflicts, if someone can make up stats about their weapon, they should be able to do this.
It isn't foolproof, but I don't believe foolproof exists, for all you need is a bigger idiot
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3021
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
- Affiliation:[redacted]
- IGN:Ivan2006
- Location:In a universe.
- Contact:
Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types
Do you have any Idea how long a faction description would become if one was to give such detailed stats about anything?
Longer than my EE thread, and if you löook at it, you´ll notice the lenght of its OP.
not everyone will have the patience to write that much, especially not at once.
Longer than my EE thread, and if you löook at it, you´ll notice the lenght of its OP.
not everyone will have the patience to write that much, especially not at once.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: Agreed Upon standard for damage of weapon types
Hence we use logic, anyone who can't follow logic would be unable to follow a standard system anyway.Ivan2006 wrote:Do you have any Idea how long a faction description would become if one was to give such detailed stats about anything?
Longer than my EE thread, and if you löook at it, you´ll notice the lenght of its OP.
not everyone will have the patience to write that much, especially not at once.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!

Spoiler: