FC Forums

Progressivism 77.5
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 34.375
Yes, yes I am.


Your test scores indicate that you are a tough-minded progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are distrustful towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
I have a more cynical attitude, this is about right.

Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a globalist.
Capitalism is bad, one world order, accurate.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a uncompromising realistic centrist with few strong convictions.
Realist? ARE YOU MAD? UNCOMPROMISING? WHY YOU-

The red, my eueballs.

Political Values

Progressivism 100
Socialism 81.25
Tenderness 53.125

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate idealistic egalitarian with an established worldview.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting


I really wasn't expecting socialism to be that high.

It's interesting how similar not only we are, but how similar those who tend to ally are.

It's also interesting how Targ's still rocking that Middle-School Weeaboo's An-Anime-Of-My-Own look.

Every time someone shows a personality test of some sort, we always end up getting similar results.
No wonder we're all here even after all these years.

Stupid similar sociotypes.

Indeed.

Despite the differences of opinion, our politics are strangely similar.

This may be disturbing. I haven't decided yet.

Progressivism 80
Socialism 12.5
Tenderness 34.375

Your test scores indicate that you are a tough-minded progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are distrustful towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Pragmatic? Maybe socially, but economically and philosophically I'm a theoretical bastard.

Your attitudes towards economics appear laissez-faire capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a libertarian.
I don't generally hold the beliefs associated with mainstream libertarianism, but oher than that, this is basically spot-on.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible radical egalitarian with several strong convictions.
>sensible
>radical
???

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
This is based on 30-50 year old data, at least. It seems accurate enough, but I don't put too much stock in it. Thanks, now get out.

Me, I'm Counting wrote:Indeed.

Despite the differences of opinion, our politics are strangely similar.

This may be disturbing. I haven't decided yet.

The people who have stuck around almost all are INTJ, above-average/gifted intelligence, and interests beyond the mainstream. If I were a jihadist group/governmental agency/online gaming community, FC would be either cancerous to ingest or a goldmine for a ready-made workgroup(most modern teams of anything are often selected based on similarity).

We're a gold mine with latent carcinogenic properties.

ACH0225 wrote:...almost all are INTJ, above-average/gifted intelligence, and interests beyond the mainstream.

From what I recall, it's more like a 50/50 split of INTJ and INTP, plus some outliers (like myself - I'm ISTP).

In many ways, I think we're too similar for our own good - when everyone has the personality of a leader or an organizer, we end up trying to manage each other and avoid taking orders. (I say this as someone who wasn't really involved with any of our projects, so take this with a boulder of salt.)

I'm pretty certain we're all qualified radicals in some way and to all of us the status quo is shit and could be improved vastly.

In other words if we all were to be elected to high political positions of power around the same time, the world would be glorious or screwed and burned to the ground.

If we could actually do anything, it becomes glorious. If, like usual, we fail to work cohesively for longer than a few days, then we're all doomed.

Shadowcatbot wrote:I'm pretty certain we're all qualified radicals in some way and to all of us the status quo is shit and could be improved vastly.

In other words if we all were to be elected to high political positions of power around the same time, the world would be glorious or screwed and burned to the ground.

Either that or greatly impro- nah what am I saying it's Fallout time.
Dibs on Canada and/or New Zealand!

I call dibs on my homeland, Ivan, sorry - New Zealand for you.