Star Wars LEGOs

Miscellaneous. No spam or advertisements, constructive discussion encouraged.
Ivan2006
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts:3021
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
Affiliation:[redacted]
IGN:Ivan2006
Location:In a universe.
Contact:
Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Ivan2006 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:15 am

Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
lightspeed12 wrote:I interested in Chima *---*
Chima? All the LEGOs in the world to choose from, and you went with Legends of Chima? :x
Well, Chima looked like "least original LEGO franchise ever" to me...
Quotes:
Spoiler:
CMA wrote:IT'S MY HOT BODY AND I DO WHAT I WANT WITH IT.
Tiel wrote:hey now no need to be rough
Daynel wrote: you can talk gay and furry to me any time
CMA wrote:And I can't fuck myself, my ass is currently occupied

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by  ҉  » Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:44 pm

Poggle the Lesser's staff is brown in the set. Really, LEGO? Really? That was so easy. How did they manage to screw it up?
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Ivan2006
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts:3021
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
Affiliation:[redacted]
IGN:Ivan2006
Location:In a universe.
Contact:

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Ivan2006 » Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:32 am

Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:Poggle the Lesser's staff is brown in the set. Really, LEGO? Really? That was so easy. How did they manage to screw it up?
I guess they didn´t have a production line for beige sticks?
Quotes:
Spoiler:
CMA wrote:IT'S MY HOT BODY AND I DO WHAT I WANT WITH IT.
Tiel wrote:hey now no need to be rough
Daynel wrote: you can talk gay and furry to me any time
CMA wrote:And I can't fuck myself, my ass is currently occupied

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by  ҉  » Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:43 am

Ivan2006 wrote:
Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:Poggle the Lesser's staff is brown in the set. Really, LEGO? Really? That was so easy. How did they manage to screw it up?
I guess they didn´t have a production line for beige sticks?
They could've gone with white, though. The staff is made of bones. They've got white sticks. /:|
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Ivan2006
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts:3021
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
Affiliation:[redacted]
IGN:Ivan2006
Location:In a universe.
Contact:

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Ivan2006 » Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:58 am

Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
Ivan2006 wrote:
Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:Poggle the Lesser's staff is brown in the set. Really, LEGO? Really? That was so easy. How did they manage to screw it up?
I guess they didn´t have a production line for beige sticks?
They could've gone with white, though. The staff is made of bones. They've got white sticks. /:|
They propably thought it was some roots and don´t have the background knoledge to think otherwise.
That´s the result you get EVERY time you let someone design merchandise for something he soesn´t even know...
Quotes:
Spoiler:
CMA wrote:IT'S MY HOT BODY AND I DO WHAT I WANT WITH IT.
Tiel wrote:hey now no need to be rough
Daynel wrote: you can talk gay and furry to me any time
CMA wrote:And I can't fuck myself, my ass is currently occupied

Chairman_Tiel
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1890
Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Chairman_Tiel » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:32 pm

If I'm not mistaken, all staffs in Lego Star Wars are just a brown lightsaber tube. It wouldn't be the first time the company's made a 'mistake' like that to cut costs.

At least it isn't like those old pre-mummified geonosians..
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by  ҉  » Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:22 pm

Tiel wrote:If I'm not mistaken, all staffs in Lego Star Wars are just a brown lightsaber tube. It wouldn't be the first time the company's made a 'mistake' like that to cut costs.

At least it isn't like those old pre-mummified geonosians..
Palpatine came with a black staff in one of the very early sets. All staffs up to this point have been correct, though. I can't think of another time they've given a Star Wars character something of completely the wrong color, although early clone troopers came with blasters with orange bolts instead of blue.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Prototype » Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:35 pm

thats probably because untill then all lego blasters had orange bolts
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by  ҉  » Mon May 06, 2013 7:10 pm

LEGO has released their Star Wars Day UCS X-wing. It is rare among Star Wars sets in that it is built at larger than minifigure scale. Despite this, its astromech droid is a standard R2-D2 minifigure, and thus noticeably too small for the rest of the fighter. Why would they do this, you ask, especially given that the UCS Delta-7 a year or so ago came with a larger, properly scaled astromech droid? I don't know. Presumably it was the same person who thought blue stormtroopers with shields were an acceptable substitute for new clone trooper minifigures.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Prototype » Tue May 07, 2013 9:04 am

Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:LEGO has released their Star Wars Day UCS X-wing. It is rare among Star Wars sets in that it is built at larger than minifigure scale. Despite this, its astromech droid is a standard R2-D2 minifigure, and thus noticeably too small for the rest of the fighter. Why would they do this, you ask, especially given that the UCS Delta-7 a year or so ago came with a larger, properly scaled astromech droid? I don't know. Presumably it was the same person who thought blue stormtroopers with shields were an acceptable substitute for new clone trooper minifigures.
It's Lego, just use the other ASM droid part rather than the one in the set, you are allowed to do that you know.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by  ҉  » Tue May 07, 2013 11:30 am

Prototype wrote:
Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:LEGO has released their Star Wars Day UCS X-wing. It is rare among Star Wars sets in that it is built at larger than minifigure scale. Despite this, its astromech droid is a standard R2-D2 minifigure, and thus noticeably too small for the rest of the fighter. Why would they do this, you ask, especially given that the UCS Delta-7 a year or so ago came with a larger, properly scaled astromech droid? I don't know. Presumably it was the same person who thought blue stormtroopers with shields were an acceptable substitute for new clone trooper minifigures.
It's Lego, just use the other ASM droid part rather than the one in the set, you are allowed to do that you know.
Unfortunately the other figure is R4-P17, and the one I need is R2-D2. In any case, the set is designed to have an actual minifigure in that seat. It is both wrong and stupid, but that's how it is, and fixing it would require redesigning the set and rebuilding with parts I don't have.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Prototype » Tue May 07, 2013 11:39 am

Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:
Prototype wrote:
Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:LEGO has released their Star Wars Day UCS X-wing. It is rare among Star Wars sets in that it is built at larger than minifigure scale. Despite this, its astromech droid is a standard R2-D2 minifigure, and thus noticeably too small for the rest of the fighter. Why would they do this, you ask, especially given that the UCS Delta-7 a year or so ago came with a larger, properly scaled astromech droid? I don't know. Presumably it was the same person who thought blue stormtroopers with shields were an acceptable substitute for new clone trooper minifigures.
It's Lego, just use the other ASM droid part rather than the one in the set, you are allowed to do that you know.
Unfortunately the other figure is R4-P17, and the one I need is R2-D2. In any case, the set is designed to have an actual minifigure in that seat. It is both wrong and stupid, but that's how it is, and fixing it would require redesigning the set and rebuilding with parts I don't have.
Simple, repaint it yourself, I did this to a storm trooper minifigure to turn it into a pigmask captain.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

Chairman_Tiel
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1890
Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by Chairman_Tiel » Tue May 07, 2013 12:35 pm

You know, there's a reason people build stuff in survival mode, there's a reason people don't make saves every 5 minutes in RPGs and reload if the slightest thing goes wrong, and there's a reason you don't mutilate your LEGOs to make them look like something else. For one, you can do some serious damage if you don't know what you're doing, and the end result almost always looks terrible if that's the case. Secondly, it shouldn't be the role of the consumer to correct idiocy on a corporation's part. Though it's fallen out of use in recent years, there's a saying - "the customer is always right". Unless they're a troll, that usually holds true.
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by  ҉  » Tue May 07, 2013 5:20 pm

I've tried painting LEGOs, when I first wanted clone trooper officers. I painted three clones with green markings and one with blue, to get the officers I needed for my platoon. They looked horrible, and I ended up buying replacement helmets on Ebay and stealing new arms from Mars Mission astronauts. I can't say that I'll never try to modify LEGO pieces again, but I certainly won't do it like that, and I would never have done it with a piece as rare and complicated as the atromech droid head. I don't even like changing the build of LEGO sets, although I did in the past, and I've been working since last September on fixing the damage I did to my collection in the process. I still have months of work to do, at this rate. So modifying the LEGOs isn't really an option, which is why it annoys me that LEGO doesn't just do it right when they sell the product. As Tiel said, I shouldn't have to dig though my box of parts to make a set work or look the way it's supposed to. My AT-TE's cannons still usually fail to fire when you press on the panel, even with the plates I put under them, and I still haven't figured out how the Malevolence's flick-fire assemblies are supposed to work. There's a bunch of gears and @#$% there that's clearly supposed to do something and fire the missiles, but who knows what it is or how you activate it. Perhaps it's build wrong? I dunno, and I've been working with LEGOs for long enough that I generally know. That really shouldn't be the case. If I purchased Jek-14's Stealth Starfighter and, say, $100 worth of aftermarket grey parts, I could probably replace all the black bits and get an actual E-wing, and have a set that belongs in Star Wars and that's worth playing with, but I shouldn't have to do that. Likewise, when they sell one of only a half-dozen or so sets that are built at larger than minifigure-scale, they should make some amount of effort to ensure that it's not designed with a stupidly undersized astromech minifigure. I've already got one of the minifigure-scale X-wings, and it's one of my favorite sets, because it feels (with good reason) like they made and sold loads of different versions and refined it until it was perfect. The astromech droid looks great there. The properly scaled astromech droid looked great on the Delta-7. But this doesn't, and that annoys me a lot given that UCS sets are designed specifically to be accurate and look awesome on display.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Star Wars LEGOs

Post by  ҉  » Fri May 10, 2013 8:17 pm

There are pictures of the Jedi Defender-Class Cruiser on Brickipedia. It comes with a Sith trooper and three people I don't recognize: a grey-skinned Sith with a red hood and two lightsabers, a Zabrak Jedi with a blue lightsaber, and an odd green Jedi wearing a white version of Luminara Unduli's hat with a double-bladed green lightsaber.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Post Reply