Futureville City Defences

Show dem ships!
Forum rules
- Threads pertaining to subject matter other than visible ship building will be moved/deleted without notice.
- Flaming or insulting other members based on their work is prohibited - constructive feedback only.
- Users may bump threads in this subforum with no penalty so long as responses build upon the current topic.
Instinct-XIV
Cadet
Cadet
Posts:45
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:43 am
Affiliation:Xtreme gaming QC
IGN:InstinctXIV
Location:In the XGQ headquarters
Contact:
Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by Instinct-XIV » Fri Dec 28, 2012 4:13 am

The story was good but it ended too abruptly.
Image

Image

Chairman_Tiel
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1890
Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by Chairman_Tiel » Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:48 pm

It's called John Carter, not Jhon Carter.

And it was a superb film, a shame it did so badly at the box office; I'd give my right leg for a sequel based on the second book of the Princess of Mars series.
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Dr. Mackeroth
Designer
Designer
Posts:397
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 11:59 pm
Affiliation:Alteran
Location:In the Holy Citadel of Altera

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by Dr. Mackeroth » Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:20 pm

Tiel wrote:It's called John Carter, not Jhon Carter.

And it was a superb film, a shame it did so badly at the box office; I'd give my right leg for a sequel based on the second book of the Princess of Mars series.
What happens in the second book? I must know.


Then after you've answered that, we still need to settle the question of orbital defense? I personally think that giant slow-moving mobile weapons platform would be cooler than a stationary one, but that's just my opinion.
This is a signature.

blockman42
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts:478
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:04 pm
Affiliation:Voxel Co.
IGN:Blockman42
Location:Holocene

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by blockman42 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:11 pm

Dr. Mackeroth wrote:
Tiel wrote:It's called John Carter, not Jhon Carter.

And it was a superb film, a shame it did so badly at the box office; I'd give my right leg for a sequel based on the second book of the Princess of Mars series.
What happens in the second book? I must know.


Then after you've answered that, we still need to settle the question of orbital defense? I personally think that giant slow-moving mobile weapons platform would be cooler than a stationary one, but that's just my opinion.
do you want another quad?

Avenger_7
Ensign
Ensign
Posts:262
Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:39 pm
IGN:Avenger_7
Location:Canada

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by Avenger_7 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:01 am

We want a 6-legged cannon mount.
Image

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by cats » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:59 am

Avenger_7 wrote:We want a 6-legged cannon mount.
I shall begin tomorrow.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by  ҉  » Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:06 am

;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Chairman_Tiel
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1890
Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by Chairman_Tiel » Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:30 am

Heeellooo desktop background.

You come here often?
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

User avatar
Iv121
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts:2414
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:40 pm
Affiliation:UTN
Location:-> HERE <-

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by Iv121 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:02 pm

Base on legs o.o , yet beaten by SC with flying bases ^-^ .
They're watching ... Image

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by cats » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:02 pm

Started work on my own fortress mech. So far I have this \/
Spoiler:
Image
The lower part of a leg and a foot. It'll be hexapedal.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

User avatar
Laserbilly
Ensign
Ensign
Posts:299
Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:31 am

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by Laserbilly » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Well this is just getting ridiculous... Looks awesome.

blockman42
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts:478
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:04 pm
Affiliation:Voxel Co.
IGN:Blockman42
Location:Holocene

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by blockman42 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:36 pm

catsonmeth wrote:Started work on my own fortress mech. So far I have this \/
Spoiler:
Image
The lower part of a leg and a foot. It'll be hexapedal.
its pretty cool and HUGE

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by cats » Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:04 am

I'm gonna make a new thread for my mech.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

blockman42
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts:478
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:04 pm
Affiliation:Voxel Co.
IGN:Blockman42
Location:Holocene

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by blockman42 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:12 am

oh ya cats, can you make the new mech a bit less curvy and more industrial?

cats
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1853
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Futureville City Defences

Post by cats » Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:15 am

blockman42 wrote:oh ya cats, can you make the new mech a bit less curvy and more industrial?
nnnNNNNNO! That'd be too easy. And against my style. If I try to make an industrial mech it'd look like... It would look awesome because I built it. But no, this will be like my dreadmech.
YES. BOW TO ME MY MINIONS.
(testificates) o(0.o)o o(0.o)o o(0.o)o o(0.o)o o(0.o)o o(0.o)o o(0.o)o o(0.o)o
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
Spoiler:
cannonfodder wrote:it's funny because sonic's face looks like a * and faces aren't supposed to look like a *

Post Reply