Page 2 of 2

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:54 pm
by fr0stbyte124
Well, it will never actually get that big. Compression and procedural generation go really long way, especially since natural terrain is decidedly non-random. But the hundreds of MB range may not be terribly unreasonable for a well-explored planet.

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:05 pm
by Tau
But there's still 2 problems:

1. The shortest range possible for a portable radio (with the current ratings) is almost interstellar.
2. If I shortened the ranges to distances on-scale with the planets, it would be too boring / unrealistic.

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:24 am
by ACH0225
Deal with it? This is hard limits vs creative sensibilities. Which do you think is more important to avoid hitting?

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:44 pm
by Tau
Well, I posted this (with extensive modification) to the MC Forums mod suggestion thingy. It's here.

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 6:14 pm
by Jasonlek
I wouldn't really like this suggestion personally.

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 7:48 pm
by Vinyl
Do you honestly think a vague opinion like that is useful to a discussion that ended 10 days ago?

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:48 am
by fr0stbyte124
I don't think it hurts. Especially since there hasn't been any discussion here in the past 10 days.

Re: Terrestrial Communication

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:57 am
by ACH0225
Think tank is slowing.