Rotors

All content discussion will take place here. Any topic that is based upon a phase 2 section must have a link back to that topic.
Professor Fenway
Texture Artist
Texture Artist
Posts:1506
Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:47 pm
Affiliation:Novus Roma
Location:Neither Here nor There
Re: Rotors

Post by Professor Fenway » Sun May 05, 2013 7:23 pm

Space fighters will not be aerodynamic, because there is no atmosphere in space. It makes sense, because it makes construction a lot cheaper. Which puts in the niche for these helis.

I don't like the massive rotors. They're bloody useless. Why have them on a flying carrier when a ship that size fulfills the same function AND goes into space?

But for small craft, certainly. Having an air raid with one would be very fun and awesome.

TinkerPox
Ensign
Ensign
Posts:192
Joined:Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:27 pm
Affiliation:Argonian
IGN:TinkerPox
Location:In the Alpha Centauri system....

Re: Rotors

Post by TinkerPox » Mon May 06, 2013 4:52 am

They still would be pretty useful, as they could launch jets and helis

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Rotors

Post by Prototype » Mon May 06, 2013 5:33 am

I don't see the point in stuff like the helicarrier, just use a ship

However, something like attack helis would be good, but these would probably be entities, however I can cook up some larger rotors for bigger transport and attack helis (like the dragon from avatar).

Perhaps rotors could be done for smaller block based craft, as thrust modules, I think that might be an idea, but for anything big they would be too weak.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

TinkerPox
Ensign
Ensign
Posts:192
Joined:Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:27 pm
Affiliation:Argonian
IGN:TinkerPox
Location:In the Alpha Centauri system....

Re: Rotors

Post by TinkerPox » Mon May 06, 2013 5:39 am

thats what I was thinking like the dragon, I mentioned it too, but I want heli-carriers too

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Rotors

Post by Prototype » Mon May 06, 2013 6:23 am

Tacokingbob wrote:thats what I was thinking like the dragon, I mentioned it too, but I want heli-carriers too
Helicarriers can be made possible, just very impractical.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
Iv121
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts:2414
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:40 pm
Affiliation:UTN
Location:-> HERE <-

Re: Rotors

Post by Iv121 » Mon May 06, 2013 7:06 am

Very VERY unpractical. That means that instead of having one universal fleet you will have 3 - One for space, one for ground and another one to tow all those useless heli-carriers you made as they can't otherwise go from planet to planet ....
They're watching ... Image

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Rotors

Post by Prototype » Mon May 06, 2013 7:13 am

Iv121 wrote:Very VERY unpractical. That means that instead of having one universal fleet you will have 3 - One for space, one for ground and another one to tow all those useless heli-carriers you made as they can't otherwise go from planet to planet ....
We should still make this possible if we are going to do rotors for small block based craft, but nobody will use it, it'll just be a feature that we can just slap on, and might be good for promo videos.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
Iv121
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts:2414
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:40 pm
Affiliation:UTN
Location:-> HERE <-

Re: Rotors

Post by Iv121 » Mon May 06, 2013 7:16 am

You don't make a future nobody uses. I suggest instead using this time and manpwoer for other, better futures. There is more than enoguh to do without it.
They're watching ... Image

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Rotors

Post by Prototype » Mon May 06, 2013 9:16 am

Iv121 wrote:You don't make a future nobody uses. I suggest instead using this time and manpwoer for other, better futures. There is more than enoguh to do without it.
If we add rotors for small block based craft (note: IF), then it would be very simple to make them work for larger craft.

Though perhaps this can be done for FC 1.1
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
fr0stbyte124
Developer
Posts:727
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:39 am
Affiliation:Aye-Aye

Re: Rotors

Post by fr0stbyte124 » Mon May 06, 2013 10:03 am

I still say it doesn't belong in this mod.

 ҉ 
Commodore
Commodore
Posts:1574
Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:50 am
Affiliation:Kzinti Empire
Location:Kzinhome

Re: Rotors

Post by  ҉  » Mon May 06, 2013 11:27 am

High Lord Fr0st has spoken! All hail Fr0st!
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;

(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")

Chairman_Tiel
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1890
Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC

Re: Rotors

Post by Chairman_Tiel » Mon May 06, 2013 12:43 pm

You said BIG rotors couldn't be in the mod, fr0st. Does that mean we still get atmospheric superiority fighters?
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Rotors

Post by Prototype » Mon May 06, 2013 1:17 pm

Tiel wrote:You said BIG rotors couldn't be in the mod, fr0st. Does that mean we still get atmospheric superiority fighters?
We can use the same engines star fighters would use.
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
Iv121
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts:2414
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:40 pm
Affiliation:UTN
Location:-> HERE <-

Re: Rotors

Post by Iv121 » Mon May 06, 2013 1:31 pm

Yea again more practical. It is more of a modelling question here but I'd rather have a bigger variety of fighters and bomber rather than radom choppers.
They're watching ... Image

"I am forbidden tag" -CvN

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Rotors

Post by Prototype » Mon May 06, 2013 1:34 pm

Iv121 wrote:Yea again more practical. It is more of a modelling question here but I'd rather have a bigger variety of fighters and bomber rather than radom choppers.
Well I still like block based drop ships and helis and the likes, because I can only make so many models, giving players the ability to make their own would be good.

But my models would b smexy-er
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

Post Reply