FC Forums

I suggest a slightly derailed version of the F-117 Nighthawk.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawk
Just because I think it´s a delta-shaped aircraft that´s NOT a B-2 and actually is real.

ACH0225 wrote:That's probably because the Star Destroyer is a space ship, while this is a bomber.

Exoatmospheric capable bomber in a sci fi mod is not considered a spaceship. You heard it here first, folks.

Tiel wrote:

ACH0225 wrote:That's probably because the Star Destroyer is a space ship, while this is a bomber.

Exoatmospheric capable bomber in a sci fi mod is not considered a spaceship. You heard it here first, folks.

I think he means like the difference between a dinghy and a battleship

Oh no, he's specified that he doesn't consider the bomber a 'ship' at least once before in the thread, I believe when I pointed out that his design doesn't even look like one.

Tiel wrote:Oh no, he's specified that he doesn't consider the bomber a 'ship' at least once before in the thread, I believe when I pointed out that his design doesn't even look like one.

I don't consider it a ship, a spacecraft however.

The two terms are synonymous.

I know, but I class big spacecraft as ships, and little ones as fighters/bombers

'ship' is a shortened variant of 'spaceship', in this context. If you say a bomber isn't a spaceship due to its size, well then, I guess neither is the space shuttle, is it?

I call it a spacecraft instead, I simply call larger spacecraft ships.

Might not exactly be logical, I just choose to refer to them as so.

and finally, I have got a dedicated model for the MG-36, at least when I fix the stand.




and....

Now can this be a threadnaught?

Well ... 1 REPLY MORE THAN YA !

Edit: Damn LJS you ninja !

Well 2 replies more than ya .

Last_Jedi_Standing wrote:Now can this be a threadnaught?

Yes, yes it can

My greatest creation.