FC content pack flan's [THREADNAUGHT]
Forum rules
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3021
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
- Affiliation:[redacted]
- IGN:Ivan2006
- Location:In a universe.
- Contact:
I suggest a slightly derailed version of the F-117 Nighthawk.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawk
Just because I think it´s a delta-shaped aircraft that´s NOT a B-2 and actually is real.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawk
Just because I think it´s a delta-shaped aircraft that´s NOT a B-2 and actually is real.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: FC content pack flan's
Exoatmospheric capable bomber in a sci fi mod is not considered a spaceship. You heard it here first, folks.ACH0225 wrote:That's probably because the Star Destroyer is a space ship, while this is a bomber.
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
I think he means like the difference between a dinghy and a battleshipTiel wrote:Exoatmospheric capable bomber in a sci fi mod is not considered a spaceship. You heard it here first, folks.ACH0225 wrote:That's probably because the Star Destroyer is a space ship, while this is a bomber.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: FC content pack flan's
Oh no, he's specified that he doesn't consider the bomber a 'ship' at least once before in the thread, I believe when I pointed out that his design doesn't even look like one.
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
I don't consider it a ship, a spacecraft however.Tiel wrote:Oh no, he's specified that he doesn't consider the bomber a 'ship' at least once before in the thread, I believe when I pointed out that his design doesn't even look like one.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
I know, but I class big spacecraft as ships, and little ones as fighters/bombers
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: FC content pack flan's
'ship' is a shortened variant of 'spaceship', in this context. If you say a bomber isn't a spaceship due to its size, well then, I guess neither is the space shuttle, is it?
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
I call it a spacecraft instead, I simply call larger spacecraft ships.
Might not exactly be logical, I just choose to refer to them as so.
Might not exactly be logical, I just choose to refer to them as so.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
and finally, I have got a dedicated model for the MG-36, at least when I fix the stand.
and....
and....
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
Now can this be a threadnaught?
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
Re: FC content pack flan's
Well ... 1 REPLY MORE THAN YA !
Edit: Damn LJS you ninja !
Well 2 replies more than ya .
Edit: Damn LJS you ninja !
Well 2 replies more than ya .
They're watching ...
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
Yes, yes it canLast_Jedi_Standing wrote:Now can this be a threadnaught?
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler: