FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Forum rules
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
i need to post it over and over again because my word are misinterperted each time
or found insulting i dont try to be insulting
and i know you have trouble with my grammar
but i really think we should switch from flans
or found insulting i dont try to be insulting
and i know you have trouble with my grammar
but i really think we should switch from flans
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: FC content pack flan's
Jedi, we're equals here in terms of authority, but bullying joykler is not something I'm going to stand for. If he wants to keep repeating his ideas, let him, there aren't any rules against it.
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
Ok, keep this off of my thread please, joykler, if you have a suggestion, make another thread, it isn't relevent here.
Jedi, don't bully people on this thread, that is my job.
One thing is certain.
I
Will
Continue
With
Flan's.
Deal with it.
P.s. joykler, you probably don't understand why I found that insulting, you are practically asking me to throw three months of work down the drain, I find that rude.
Jedi, don't bully people on this thread, that is my job.
One thing is certain.
I
Will
Continue
With
Flan's.
Deal with it.
P.s. joykler, you probably don't understand why I found that insulting, you are practically asking me to throw three months of work down the drain, I find that rude.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
if my idea would happen [probebly not]
your time wouldnt be wasted because you could slightly alter it to the animation of warcraft
and you would have alot of training and experience in building ships and weapons
i mean look at the turrets from the basic set
and look at the balistea turret form warcraft
then you would see the diffrence in quality
in ways of targeting[also automatic targeting]
animations
and just the overal looks
and i wont post here again unless you ask me to
your time wouldnt be wasted because you could slightly alter it to the animation of warcraft
and you would have alot of training and experience in building ships and weapons
i mean look at the turrets from the basic set
and look at the balistea turret form warcraft
then you would see the diffrence in quality
in ways of targeting[also automatic targeting]
animations
and just the overal looks
and i wont post here again unless you ask me to
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
I understand that bit, but there IS NOT SUPPORT FOR USER MADE CONTENT.joykler wrote:if my idea would happen [probebly not]
your time wouldnt be wasted because you could slightly alter it to the animation of warcraft
and you would have alot of training and experience in building ships and weapons
i mean look at the turrets from the basic set
and look at the balistea turret form warcraft
then you would see the diffrence in quality
in ways of targeting[also automatic targeting]
animations
and just the overal looks
and i wont post here again unless you ask me to
And I am no coder, so I am severely limited.
For actual FC, we could take a look at this, but not for the Flan pack, I suggest you make a separate thread for your ideas.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
There's the one against spam, and the one against off-topic. Both of those have to kick in at some point. But very well.Tiel wrote:Jedi, we're equals here in terms of authority, but bullying joykler is not something I'm going to stand for. If he wants to keep repeating his ideas, let him, there aren't any rules against it.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: FC content pack flan's
Spamming is a conscientious offense. From what I've seen joykler legitimately sees nothing wrong with his ideas and is restating them to clear up confusion about them. As for offtopic, well, that discussion's been had already. And even so, the current subject is anything but irrelevant to the thread's purpose itself.
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: FC content pack flan's
First, the on topic bit- We need deplorable missiles that can be fired from bombers, like ICBM mod only on a supersonic bomber. Then we also need an angular supersonic bomber. Then we also also need helicopters, preferably 2 types that can carry people or guns.
Now the off-topic part. I don't think joykler understands the concept of "not interested". Similar to cool3303's Aliens idea, when most/all of the community said no, he continued. Therefore, I denounce joykler to be cool3303. And I looked up this ancient warfare mod: has no owls.
Now the off-topic part. I don't think joykler understands the concept of "not interested". Similar to cool3303's Aliens idea, when most/all of the community said no, he continued. Therefore, I denounce joykler to be cool3303. And I looked up this ancient warfare mod: has no owls.
mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
That's is a to harsh of a * for him, joykler he didn't do any destructive criticism, he didn't make ships and brag about them (even if they were extremely bad), and he defiantly did not insult anyone on the forum.ACH0225 wrote:First, the on topic bit- We need deplorable missiles that can be fired from bombers, like ICBM mod only on a supersonic bomber. Then we also need an angular supersonic bomber. Then we also also need helicopters, preferably 2 types that can carry people or guns.
Now the off-topic part. I don't think joykler understands the concept of "not interested". Similar to cool3303's Aliens idea, when most/all of the community said no, he continued. Therefore, I denounce joykler to be cool3303. And I looked up this ancient warfare mod: has no owls.
"The Sky is the Limit"
Commander Error wrote:"Titan" - Moves slightly quicker than a glacier, on a good day.
Prototype wrote:F-14s are just gay Tornados.
Catsonmeth wrote:Which meant every two weeks, Tuesday night was reserved for mainlining coffee and getting sensual with a keyboard
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: FC content pack flan's
He's hiding.
mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: FC content pack flan's
See, that's the thing I've been having doubts about.
Cool was one instance where a guy trying to make friends ended up getting ostracized by the entire community with the blessing of the staff, just because his suggestions were less than perfect.
I'm going to do anything within my power to stop that from happening again.
e: Also, is deployable=deplorable a 'thing' now?
Cool was one instance where a guy trying to make friends ended up getting ostracized by the entire community with the blessing of the staff, just because his suggestions were less than perfect.
I'm going to do anything within my power to stop that from happening again.
e: Also, is deployable=deplorable a 'thing' now?
Re: FC content pack flan's
I agree that not everything that happened to Cool was deserved, but there's a limit to the amount of stupidity any normal person can be expected to take. I understand that Cool's language issues complicated the matter, but at the same time he clearly wasn't putting all that much effort into being a productive forum member.Tiel wrote:See, that's the thing I've been having doubts about.
Cool was one instance where a guy trying to make friends ended up getting ostracized by the entire community with the blessing of the staff, just because his suggestions were less than perfect.
I'm going to do anything within my power to stop that from happening again.
This should probably be moved to another thread, although I'm not sure what that thread should be.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: FC content pack flan's
Cool was trolling. I went back and read the posts. He threatened the forum multiple times, as well as insulting most of the forum members. I neither regret nor disapprove of what happened to him.
mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
I know you don't, because you have PM'd me multiple times that you think some newcomer is Cool3303 reborn even though they talk nothing like him.
- I can be reached as ducky215 on minecraft forums -
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2312
- Joined:Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:21 pm
- Affiliation:Strigiforme
- IGN:ACH0225
- Location:Cuuyth
Re: FC content pack flan's
Shush. I was right a few thymes. Do hovercopters work in Flans?
mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Spoiler: