FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Forum rules
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts:2623
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:46 pm
- Affiliation:Nivanshae
- IGN:_Shadowcat_
- Location:Munching on important looking wires.
Fucking lag throwers of death?
In yo ceiling, stealin yo wires
Do not open. Ever. At all. Enter at your own risk to life and limb.
Trigger warning
Bot gore warning
Memetic biohazard
Error bait
Do not open. Ever. At all. Enter at your own risk to life and limb.
Trigger warning
Bot gore warning
Memetic biohazard
Error bait
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Could the LRAC be less explosive more long range
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
That was the plan.Mercury Steam wrote:Could the LRAC be less explosive more long range
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
cannonfodder wrote:[Moderated]
And for more on-topic, easter updates are coming up and I've really neglected my job for the official packs, one quick tiger later:
EDIT: Also, Chieftain
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Needed a light tank.
So here it is (or part of it, still need tracks), the LT-6 Chimera.
Armed with 150mm derpcannon because why not.
So here it is (or part of it, still need tracks), the LT-6 Chimera.
Armed with 150mm derpcannon because why not.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3217
- Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:54 pm
- Affiliation:Hexalan
- IGN:PCaptainRexK
- Location:Hexalan
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Needs more long.
cats wrote:I literally cannot be wrong about this fictional universe
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Chimera model finished:
And...well, testing was certainly interesting.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/y3nsd7j0hst7r ... k.mp4?dl=0
And...well, testing was certainly interesting.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/y3nsd7j0hst7r ... k.mp4?dl=0
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
It is easy, I just didn't set the wheel positions up and thought that would magically work for some reason.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Well today I dug up an old project and got a little creative:
Not going to lie, the tank turret still looks shit, but if I chop that off and give it a proper body... it might actually turn out half decent.
Not going to lie, the tank turret still looks shit, but if I chop that off and give it a proper body... it might actually turn out half decent.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3021
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
- Affiliation:[redacted]
- IGN:Ivan2006
- Location:In a universe.
- Contact:
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
I'll be honest, that looks like someone tried to build an AT-ST and only realized he didn't have any sci-fi weapons halfway through.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
-
- Moderator
- Posts:4205
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:49 am
- Affiliation:CNI
- IGN:FC_Rangefinder
- Location:Sol IIIa, School of Hard Knocks
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Looks like the ST-1 from the War Thunder April Fool's event. Place KV-2 turret on walker legs = stronk walking tenk
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Funny thing is this was probably started before the ST-1. Then furiously overhauled when the ST-1 proved that tank mechs can look decent.
And I've now been told apparently we are going to continue with the tank mech thing, I'll still make a mech mech version, but we might be able to convince Flan to fix a few things with the mech code if we keep at the tankmech pack.
Hopefully we might be able to convince him quadruped mechs are a good idea, because this is what the other guy did, and god knows it needs more legs:
And I've now been told apparently we are going to continue with the tank mech thing, I'll still make a mech mech version, but we might be able to convince Flan to fix a few things with the mech code if we keep at the tankmech pack.
Hopefully we might be able to convince him quadruped mechs are a good idea, because this is what the other guy did, and god knows it needs more legs:
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler: