FC content pack flan's [UBERTHREADNAUGHT]
Forum rules
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
- All off-topic posts will be removed without notice.
- Poorly written topics/posts will be edited without warning
- Unnecessary topics will be deleted or locked without warning.
- Posts may be moved without warning.
yes its a free to use basic for
the use of vehilcles and such
where you can freely eddit everything and make your own
but im not talkin about him quitting his mod
but we could help him with his mod while we are
on the basics of his mod making our own mod [pieces of it]
we give a part of it to him
we learn of what we have done and take it with us when we seperate from eachother
then he has a better more diverse mod
and we have learned alot
a good ai
a good way of building generation
fantastic vehicles
because why would he abandon his mod
but it isnt ancien warcraft
he has landmines,high expllosives and things like that
oh i forgot to mention a hand rocket launcher !
also the way he made gates and bridges would be very usefull for us too
the use of vehilcles and such
where you can freely eddit everything and make your own
but im not talkin about him quitting his mod
but we could help him with his mod while we are
on the basics of his mod making our own mod [pieces of it]
we give a part of it to him
we learn of what we have done and take it with us when we seperate from eachother
then he has a better more diverse mod
and we have learned alot
a good ai
a good way of building generation
fantastic vehicles
because why would he abandon his mod
but it isnt ancien warcraft
he has landmines,high expllosives and things like that
oh i forgot to mention a hand rocket launcher !
also the way he made gates and bridges would be very usefull for us too
Re: FC content pack flan's
Okay, just checking. YOU DIDN'T POST ANYTHING ON HIS MOD PAGE RIGHT?
- I can be reached as ducky215 on minecraft forums -
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
You ask why I'm doing this with Flan's, well for a start the minecraft modelling community is crntered around Flan's mod, and I don't know if this is immediately obvious to you, but this is more about the models, now while the ancient warfare mod looks nice, however I cannot locate anything that support user made content (tell me if there is). Also this topic is about Flan's mod, and the development of the content pack.joykler wrote:can i ask a question
why flans
i suggest to negotiate with the ancient warfare mod[that is not so ancient anymore with high explosives and all]
to ask if he would change it to warfare mod and to start working on some projects in there
he has a really good system for vehicles ,turrets and overall weapons
he has new soldier,medic,engineer ai's [could be used for manning space ships]
they react not perfectly jet but the look very buisy and try to hide for dangerous situations
he has a great way of lagg free automatic building
the vehicle animations look great
so i would look at the site and think about it because it would be alot better than flans [sorry for saying]
You say we should get these people to help us, well I am secretly working on that, this pack will be released on quite a high profile on Manus's site (AKA the majority of the modelling community), and will be linked to a very convincing release page, with details about FC and a call for help conveniently placed at the bottom.
Also Flan's mod is waaaaay more popular than ancient warfare.
This was a good suggestion, but Flan's mod is not only superior, it supports user made stuff here, also bear in mind I am no fr0stbyte, all the coding I have done has been entirely self taught, without the modelling helper I would be screwed.
As for craft studio, Manus has already said it is useless for Flan's stuff, because it doesn't export as turbomodelthingy.
Also we shouldn't go to modders for help, we should make them come to us. Asking for help with nothing to show that we have done anything is stupid.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
you keep reversing my words
i know our place i know other modders would only help us at this point thru pity
or just when they dont have anything to do
but i say help them
because you want to model ahead for the mod that would eventually come
but what we want needs more details and better controls
i think if we offer them our help
he maybe gives some instructions
so new modders can learn how to do it
and we could make the models with the quality we want and learn much more in the process
and say an update comes of ancient warcraft and we could show a big part of our future mod it would be much more noticed then when we make [a good looking but still] again a content pack
he just has to call it warcraft
and we could help them
and im posting this here because all the people who make the models have to decide
and common we could never achieve our goal with flans not even close
i know our place i know other modders would only help us at this point thru pity
or just when they dont have anything to do
but i say help them
because you want to model ahead for the mod that would eventually come
but what we want needs more details and better controls
i think if we offer them our help
he maybe gives some instructions
so new modders can learn how to do it
and we could make the models with the quality we want and learn much more in the process
and say an update comes of ancient warcraft and we could show a big part of our future mod it would be much more noticed then when we make [a good looking but still] again a content pack
he just has to call it warcraft
and we could help them
and im posting this here because all the people who make the models have to decide
and common we could never achieve our goal with flans not even close
- fr0stbyte124
- Developer
- Posts:727
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:39 am
- Affiliation:Aye-Aye
Re: FC content pack flan's
wat.joykler wrote: i know our place i know other modders would only help us at this point thru pity
Re: FC content pack flan's
We're not trying to. This isn't Futurecraft. This is about a content pack for Flan's Mod. It is not the first step to Futurecraft fighters, unless the models are reused.joykler wrote:and common we could never achieve our goal with flans not even close
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
The models will likely be reused, if not it gives me good practice, better to **** up now than n the real thingLast_Jedi_Standing wrote:We're not trying to. This isn't Futurecraft. This is about a content pack for Flan's Mod. It is not the first step to Futurecraft fighters, unless the models are reused.joykler wrote:and common we could never achieve our goal with flans not even close
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
so why put this in the development thread
then you could better put this in the minecraft thread
because if it isnt for the development of the mod but just for training then this isnt the place for it
or is it ?
then you could better put this in the minecraft thread
because if it isnt for the development of the mod but just for training then this isnt the place for it
or is it ?
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
*facepalm*joykler wrote:so why put this in the development thread
then you could better put this in the minecraft thread
because if it isnt for the development of the mod but just for training then this isnt the place for it
or is it ?
I give up, somebody else tell him
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: FC content pack flan's
I don't mean to doubt fr0st's irrefutable logic here, but the appeal of unlocking the potential of LWGL to utilize .obj files in MC would lie in having higher fidelity models. Yet, in order to keep a consistent theme throughout the mod, 3d entities are going to have to be blocky anyway, so I don't see why the vehicles in this thread wouldn't be re-used.
Re: FC content pack flan's
i get that you maybe want parts of it and the rest for training
but its darn ugly within flans you can make things as nice as possible but it would stillbe ugly
if you really want to practice you should use a better basic
if you dont want to practice dont post here
if you want to use this: i know this mod wil never truly succeed
if you just want to have some fun with it put it in the minecraft thread
and tiel look at the ancient warcraft mod thats also blocky but it is far nicer
but its darn ugly within flans you can make things as nice as possible but it would stillbe ugly
if you really want to practice you should use a better basic
if you dont want to practice dont post here
if you want to use this: i know this mod wil never truly succeed
if you just want to have some fun with it put it in the minecraft thread
and tiel look at the ancient warcraft mod thats also blocky but it is far nicer
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: FC content pack flan's
I plan to reuse these models, and Flans mod is the best way to test them out, and gains us a little publicity.
That is why this is in development joykler, do you understand now?
Basically .obj models will only be slightly cooler than tmt stuff, we don't want it looking like the BMW mod, which is ridiculous.
And joykler, how is the ancient warfare mod relevant? Explain how I don't understand what you are getting at.
As for ugly, and the mod will never truly succeed, I am quite frankly offended.
That is why this is in development joykler, do you understand now?
Basically .obj models will only be slightly cooler than tmt stuff, we don't want it looking like the BMW mod, which is ridiculous.
And joykler, how is the ancient warfare mod relevant? Explain how I don't understand what you are getting at.
As for ugly, and the mod will never truly succeed, I am quite frankly offended.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
Re: FC content pack flan's
Joykler, please just stop posting here. You aren't being productive and it's derailing the thread. Come back when you make sense.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
Re: FC content pack flan's
i just think
flans mod cant achieve what this mod has to stand for
i think even if you are the best desinger possible [and i really like your desinges] flans mod just has all these boundries
that ancient warcraft can achieve with your help what we want
it isnt the bmw mod it doesnt even look like it
but i sayd al these things earlier
just look at the mod its called ancient warcraft and yes its based on it but it also
has
projectory control
and mines
also the doors,bridges and soldier /engineer ai is awsome and a good start for our soldiers
sorry i dont make sense i try to just read it carefully and i hope you get what im saying
and i dont think what you make is ugly but just flans mod is ugly
flans mod cant achieve what this mod has to stand for
i think even if you are the best desinger possible [and i really like your desinges] flans mod just has all these boundries
that ancient warcraft can achieve with your help what we want
it isnt the bmw mod it doesnt even look like it
but i sayd al these things earlier
just look at the mod its called ancient warcraft and yes its based on it but it also
has
projectory control
and mines
also the doors,bridges and soldier /engineer ai is awsome and a good start for our soldiers
sorry i dont make sense i try to just read it carefully and i hope you get what im saying
and i dont think what you make is ugly but just flans mod is ugly
Re: FC content pack flan's
Go away. Stating your opinion over and over again isn't helping anything here. What you are asking for is nonsensical.
;.'.;'::.;:".":;",,;':",;
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")
(Kzinti script, as best as can be displayed in Human characters, translated roughly as "For the Patriarchy!")