Ivan2006 wrote:Manus, prepare for extermination!

Ivan2006 wrote:Manus, prepare for extermination!
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
FTFYIcelandic Perehelion wrote:The Madcat does look pretty adorkable next to it.
cats wrote:I literally cannot be wrong about this fictional universe
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
It's fine, I can work something out from it. Though if you are going to design a few I was planning to make an anti-infantry duel Gatling gun type thing. And anything else you may think of.catsonmeth wrote:Looks like you married my two designs. Looks good, the balance is quite nice. I had intended the weapons to have more lateral horizontal body than vertical so as to separate it somewhat from the torso, but I hadn't considered the feasibility of mirroring the model. I can redesign a PAC if you'd like, since its notable features were used in the cannon, and any other weapons needed.
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Because we already have cannon based artillery.ACH0225 wrote:Why not rocket artillery?
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.
Did I not say I wanted a cluster rocket launcher?ACH0225 wrote:The difference between rocket and cannon artillery is that rocket arty has a big spread. You need it.
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
mfw brony imagesfr0stbyte124 wrote:5 months from now, I will publish a paper on an efficient method for rendering millions of owls to a screen.