Inventory ideas portaining to fighters, ammunition, and othe

[CaptainSporatic]

All I gota say is, if this is implamented, Im gona alter all my inner clothing to have holsters, sheaths, ect, and walk around with a hundred and one weapons under my coat!

All I can see is this but with a coat:

Spoiler:

[Shadowcatbot]

I ve preveard for ze Zumbie pocalypse!

[Prototype]

I ve preveard for ze Zumbie pocalypse!

*I've
*prepared
*the
*zombie
*apocolapse

Ok now that's done all I can say is if this idea allows people to walk round with a few hundred MGs, it's not a very good idea.

[Dr. Mackeroth]

All I gota say is, if this is implamented, Im gona alter all my inner clothing to have holsters, sheaths, ect, and walk around with a hundred and one weapons under my coat!

All I can see is this but with a coat:

Spoiler:

That is amusing. However, it is off topic.



I do think it will be eventually be necessary to avoid players having large objects in their inventory. But then again, part of Minecraft is it's unrealism.

[Vinyl]

*apocolapse

*apocalypse

[Prototype]

*apocolapse

*apocalypse

*dammit

How about weight points for each item, instead of having a fancy layer system, make it so you can only carry a certain number of certain items in your inv

[Dux_Tell31]

*apocolapse

*apocalypse

*dammit

How about weight points for each item, instead of having a fancy layer system, make it so you can only carry a certain number of certain items in your inv

This makes no sense at all, the inventory is the item limit. I can agree with not having tanks in your backpack, but anything short of that should be ok.

[Prototype]

*dammit

How about weight points for each item, instead of having a fancy layer system, make it so you can only carry a certain number of certain items in your inv

This makes no sense at all, the inventory is the item limit. I can agree with not having tanks in your backpack, but anything short of that should be ok.

I mean certain items have say, weight points, so tanks for example, make it so that you can only carry, say ten of these weight points in your inventory, whereas materials and ammunition should not be weighted

[Shadowcatbot]

I never understood how steve could carry so many stacks of iron blocks, And he doesnt even have a backpack...

[Prototype]

I never understood how steve could carry so many stacks of iron blocks, And he doesnt even have a backpack...

Come to think of it, where does Steve actually put all his stuff, it's not in his hands and he only has two standard jeans pockets. No room for tanks

[Shadowcatbot]

My theory is he has REALLLY big underwear.

[Prototype]

My theory is he has REALLLY big underwear.

I'm not even sure if he wears underwear,

But that doesn't matter we are getting off topic

So should players be restricted to the number of weapons they can carry or does it not matter?

[҉]

My theory is he has REALLLY big underwear.

I'm not even sure if he wears underwear,

But that doesn't matter we are getting off topic

So should players be restricted to the number of weapons they can carry or does it not matter?

Of course. Players can only carry 36 weapons, because that's how many slots the inventory has. Of course, if they have all those weapons, they won't have any ammunition. Or anything else, for that matter. I think that by far the simplest way to do this is to simply not have tanks and stuff be items. Instead of crafting them on a crafting table (which doesn't make that much sense anyway), there could be some other method of creation, like a factory, that results in completed tanks rolling off an assembly line instead of getting put into chests.

[Prototype]

Actually, that makes more sense than anything else, but how about we make tanks in the same way we make ships?

[Shadowcatbot]

But then they would look <CENSORED>, You can make a borg cube, But a borg tank wont look good period.

JEDIT: Warning for profanity.