Wiki things
http://futurecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Semi- ... of_Weapons!
http://futurecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Semi- ... f_Machines
http://futurecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Semi- ... f_Vehicles
http://futurecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Semi- ... ld_Weapons
Please help me fill them out. Once they are somewhat filled out, I'll make a post on the MCForums post like this one asking for advice there.
http://futurecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Semi- ... f_Machines
http://futurecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Semi- ... f_Vehicles
http://futurecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Semi- ... ld_Weapons
Please help me fill them out. Once they are somewhat filled out, I'll make a post on the MCForums post like this one asking for advice there.
- I can be reached as ducky215 on minecraft forums -
Re: Wiki things
i think mechs wouldnt only be for fighting
they are also great for big mining or wood cutting with a single punch
we also discussed they might be used to carry items and farm
but you can do more in the vehicle section
what about our zepplin like thing
and the fighters and the dreadnaughts
they are also great for big mining or wood cutting with a single punch
we also discussed they might be used to carry items and farm
but you can do more in the vehicle section
what about our zepplin like thing
and the fighters and the dreadnaughts
Re: Wiki things
I suggest you not to write entries in the wiki yet. With such sketchy idea at best about what we gonna do it's pointless at this point plus it's one big mess already with loads of articles that we cannot classify as "cannon" or "non-cannon". I myself believe that having a page for every player made faction will be a catastrophic mess due to the difficulty in monitoring and maintaining it. I doubt that a guy who closes his faction would bother to delete its page, I believe there will be many flying pony stuff that ruins immersion, overall inconsistencies with the fully "cannon" story that will confuse people ...
They're watching ...
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
Re: Wiki things
Agreed, though this thread really has nothing to do with factions or community lore.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
Re: Wiki things
do you mean canon?Iv121 wrote:I suggest you not to write entries in the wiki yet. With such sketchy idea at best about what we gonna do it's pointless at this point plus it's one big mess already with loads of articles that we cannot classify as "cannon" or "non-cannon". I myself believe that having a page for every player made faction will be a catastrophic mess due to the difficulty in monitoring and maintaining it. I doubt that a guy who closes his faction would bother to delete its page, I believe there will be many flying pony stuff that ruins immersion, overall inconsistencies with the fully "cannon" story that will confuse people ...
"The Sky is the Limit"
Commander Error wrote:"Titan" - Moves slightly quicker than a glacier, on a good day.
Prototype wrote:F-14s are just gay Tornados.
Catsonmeth wrote:Which meant every two weeks, Tuesday night was reserved for mainlining coffee and getting sensual with a keyboard
Re: Wiki things
CatsVsNinjas wrote:do you mean canon?Iv121 wrote:I suggest you not to write entries in the wiki yet. With such sketchy idea at best about what we gonna do it's pointless at this point plus it's one big mess already with loads of articles that we cannot classify as "cannon" or "non-cannon". I myself believe that having a page for every player made faction will be a catastrophic mess due to the difficulty in monitoring and maintaining it. I doubt that a guy who closes his faction would bother to delete its page, I believe there will be many flying pony stuff that ruins immersion, overall inconsistencies with the fully "cannon" story that will confuse people ...
No, he means that he would like to shoot the story out of a cannon
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
Re: Wiki things
These wiki articles are just for me to get an idea for what needs implementing. ofc I would like to do it in very few items, but have those be custom and nameable, and maybe even have more sprites. I don't know.
- I can be reached as ducky215 on minecraft forums -
Re: Wiki things
what needs implementing ?
thats what im doing...
thats what im doing...
Re: Wiki things
Nah, you're the ideas guy, ideas which are usually about game mechanics rather than content.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
Re: Wiki things
ah ok...
- fr0stbyte124
- Developer
- Posts:727
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:39 am
- Affiliation:Aye-Aye
Re: Wiki things
As I've said numerous times, Joykler's job is supposed to be locating discussion and debate threads and organizing them into something coherent. Anything beyond that, including voting on which ideas have the most merit, is extraneous and is being done in an unofficial capacity.
Re: Wiki things
I said nothing contradicting that.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler: