Great news

Concerning changes to the rules, styling, etc. As this is a new forum, feedback is appreciated.
Post Reply
Chairman_Tiel
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1890
Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Great news

Post by Chairman_Tiel » Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:47 pm

Site is Image
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Ivan2006
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts:3021
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
Affiliation:[redacted]
IGN:Ivan2006
Location:In a universe.
Contact:

Re: Great news

Post by Ivan2006 » Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:49 pm

What does that mean?
Quotes:
Spoiler:
CMA wrote:IT'S MY HOT BODY AND I DO WHAT I WANT WITH IT.
Tiel wrote:hey now no need to be rough
Daynel wrote: you can talk gay and furry to me any time
CMA wrote:And I can't fuck myself, my ass is currently occupied

User avatar
fr0stbyte124
Developer
Posts:727
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:39 am
Affiliation:Aye-Aye

Re: Great news

Post by fr0stbyte124 » Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:34 pm

It's about how subdomains are handled in the url. Class B means the site allows you to use http://www.futurecraftforums.tk but it all traffic is redirected to http://futurecraftforums.tk. Class A is the default for most servers and treats the www subdomain and no subdomain identically. Class C is the most stringent and refuses access using the www domain.

In general you want the subdomain usage to be as well-defined as possible, so B is better than A.
Also, it is worth noting that this is not an actual rule, but more of a suggestion from no-www.org, and there are people who think it should be just the opposite, and that every site should make use of the www subdomain.

The W3C test is just about the only test that really matters, as this relates to how the site is going to work across browsers.

Chairman_Tiel
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts:1890
Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC

Re: Great news

Post by Chairman_Tiel » Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:41 pm

No, but now anti-www extremists won't come throwing firebombs at the serverbox! That's good, right?
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

User avatar
fr0stbyte124
Developer
Posts:727
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:39 am
Affiliation:Aye-Aye

Re: Great news

Post by fr0stbyte124 » Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:43 pm

If they take issue with whether a site uses a default subdomain, I can't imagine there is anything terribly extreme about them.

Prototype
Developer
Posts:2968
Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
Affiliation:NSCD
IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
Location:Yes

Re: Great news

Post by Prototype » Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:57 pm

fr0stbyte124 wrote:If they take issue with whether a site uses a default subdomain, I can't imagine there is anything terribly extreme about them.
They could be insane, or extremely ticked off
Spoiler:
Image
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Image

Spoiler:
Image

Post Reply