The Board of GMs
At the moment, there are two people that will be on the Board of GMs. These people are Fenway (if he wishes) and myself. We need one more to do anything. If you would like to nominate someone, post them in the thread.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler:
-
- Texture Artist
- Posts:1506
- Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:47 pm
- Affiliation:Novus Roma
- Location:Neither Here nor There
Re: The Board of GMs
I suppose I can do it. I offer ACH; his owlyness is essentially seniority.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3021
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
- Affiliation:[redacted]
- IGN:Ivan2006
- Location:In a universe.
- Contact:
Re: The Board of GMs
I support ACH.
He's basically a requirement for making owl lore.
I generally disapprove of Tiel getting involved in GM-stuff, because he is strictly against Conspiracy-stuff, which would result in a threat of GM-intervention for intelligence/covert actions.
He's basically a requirement for making owl lore.
I generally disapprove of Tiel getting involved in GM-stuff, because he is strictly against Conspiracy-stuff, which would result in a threat of GM-intervention for intelligence/covert actions.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: The Board of GMs
You act as if I've curried for a role in this.
But yes, you're correct in your presumption that I'm pretty much for deleting Conspiracy. The only reason for it existing in the first place is to troll other users, which as you've pointed out is against the rules.
e: just saw poll. Sorry, don't really have time for this, as much as I'd like to. ACH win by default?
But yes, you're correct in your presumption that I'm pretty much for deleting Conspiracy. The only reason for it existing in the first place is to troll other users, which as you've pointed out is against the rules.
e: just saw poll. Sorry, don't really have time for this, as much as I'd like to. ACH win by default?
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3021
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:10 pm
- Affiliation:[redacted]
- IGN:Ivan2006
- Location:In a universe.
- Contact:
Re: The Board of GMs
I would like to know how 'using off-board roleplay to get an advantage' is trolling in your opinion.
Quotes:
Spoiler:
Re: The Board of GMs
I don't know, does that mean that I cannot be a GM in an RP of my own ? Or that I need to consult this board with all RP related ? Because from the description in your idea thread it sounds like a bad idea, it means everyone but that board looses any right to their canon.
They're watching ...
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: The Board of GMs
Nothing's stopping you from PMing each other or using other discrete means to gain an advantage in-RP (which is something I really disagree with, though I digress) but forming an official group and namedropping it every other post is what constitutes trolling to me. The only point of such behavior is because you derive satisfaction from knowing it's going to annoy people that they have no idea or any means to get an idea of what you're playing at.Ivan2006 wrote:I would like to know how 'using off-board roleplay to get an advantage' is trolling in your opinion.
Last edited by Chairman_Tiel on Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts:3217
- Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:54 pm
- Affiliation:Hexalan
- IGN:PCaptainRexK
- Location:Hexalan
Re: The Board of GMs
You need only deal with the Board if you plan on doing a Canon RP.Iv121 wrote:I don't know, does that mean that I cannot be a GM in an RP of my own ? Or that I need to consult this board with all RP related ? Because from the description in your idea thread it sounds like a bad idea, it means everyone but that board looses any right to their canon.
cats wrote:I literally cannot be wrong about this fictional universe
-
- Developer
- Posts:2968
- Joined:Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 am
- Affiliation:NSCD
- IGN:Currently:Small_Bear
- Location:Yes
Re: The Board of GMs
While I think Tiel could do it better, I also know he wouldn't want to, so ACH wins here.
And Ivan, the conspiracy was rather annoying, at least when you were dropping [redacted]s like turds after vindaloo night, which is what I believe Tiel is referring to.
And Ivan, the conspiracy was rather annoying, at least when you were dropping [redacted]s like turds after vindaloo night, which is what I believe Tiel is referring to.
Spoiler:
Mistake Not... wrote: This isn't rocket science, *!
Spoiler:
-
- Moderator
- Posts:4205
- Joined:Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:49 am
- Affiliation:CNI
- IGN:FC_Rangefinder
- Location:Sol IIIa, School of Hard Knocks
Re: The Board of GMs
They only have power in a FutureCraft canon RP. You can start your own freely.Iv121 wrote:I don't know, does that mean that I cannot be a GM in an RP of my own ? Or that I need to consult this board with all RP related ? Because from the description in your idea thread it sounds like a bad idea, it means everyone but that board looses any right to their canon.
Also, they can turn down parts of your nation/faction canon only if it flagrantly doesn't line up with the overall canon, or is massively OP or something.
Re: The Board of GMs
See point being that ppl just tend to pick less those RPs that are not "canon" as the later means " Fenway" and "official" for them , such biased people we are, this makes me worried.
They're watching ...
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
"I am forbidden tag" -CvN
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: The Board of GMs
Truth be told I feel we should force Fenway to give an oath to never 'ragequit' again seeing as this is a thing.
-
- Texture Artist
- Posts:1506
- Joined:Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:47 pm
- Affiliation:Novus Roma
- Location:Neither Here nor There
Re: The Board of GMs
I give my complete and irrevocable word that I, Fenway, will not quit the RP section permanently for any reason from now until the forum's death. I acknowledge that should I fail to uphold this oath, I will be stripped of all powers within the RP community. I will reserve the right to take occasional breaks from roleplaying, but the instant these lapse into permanent leave or 'ragequitting,' I forfeit all rights to the RP community.
Signed this day, April 25th, 2014, by Hierarch Professor Fenway.
This legal statement edited and approved by Head of Security B. Polzak
Signed this day, April 25th, 2014, by Hierarch Professor Fenway.
This legal statement edited and approved by Head of Security B. Polzak
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts:1890
- Joined:Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:39 am
- Affiliation:GLORIOUS REPUBLIC
Re: The Board of GMs
Re: The Board of GMs
My only concern with Ach being on the board is that, when it gets down to nip and cut, there might be turbulence because his faction is such a large part of history.
@Iv: What everyone else said. There's nothing to stop you from mastering your own RP, but the Board would have to be consulted and oversee any matter involving canon.
@Iv: What everyone else said. There's nothing to stop you from mastering your own RP, but the Board would have to be consulted and oversee any matter involving canon.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a completely ad-hoc plot device"
— David Langford
— David Langford
Spoiler: